Sunday, May 13, 2012

Controversial NSB-TFC deal to be reversed this week

By Duruthu Edirimuni Chandrasekera

The controversial 390 million-rupee deal between some investors/directors at The Finance Co (TFC) and state-owned National Savings Bank (NSB) is set to be reversed this week, informed sources said.

This follows a meeting the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has had with directors of Taprobane Securities, on Thursday, Tushara Jayaratne, Assistant Director External Relations, SEC told the Business Times. “Currently we are discussing with the broker concerned on how to resolve this issue. Nothing (concrete) has been decided up to now,” he added.

The sources said that Fitch Ratings, which last September affirmed its long term AAA Fitch Ratings for the 9th consecutive year, was also reviewing the developments in the context of the new risk element faced by the bank. However Fitch officials declined to comment other than say they are waiting for further developments next week.

Two of the sellers Dinal Wijemanne and ABC Radio Group chairman Raynor Silva are directors of TFC. Mr Wijemanne is also CEO of Taprobane Securities which was both the buying and selling broker of the 13 % stake which has triggered a major row as NSB bought it at a premium – Rs 50 per share against the market price of Rs 30-31 per share.

With the heat on and the President ordering the NSB to cancel the transaction, the sources said that the four sellers of the TFC’s 13% have agreed to buy back the share at the same Rs 50 per share price.

 High networth investor Yoga Perera, a well-known motor car dealer and his brother were the other two sellers. Anura Fernando, a former tea trader and independent director at TFC, also sold shares later.

“They have made an application to the SEC for sanction to buy back the shares from NSB and they are awaiting a response,” a source told the Business Times. He said that the SEC will explain whether it will be an on or off-the-floor transaction once they grant approval for the buy back.

SEC has also launched a probe into possible insider dealing in the transaction and SEC officials on May 4 visited the premises of Taprobane Securities and took into possession some documents and data relating to their investigations, Mr Jayaratne said.

While the loss-making deal has been slammed by many sections of the market, traders accused the settlement bank, Sampath Bank, of delaying payments to Taprobane Securities over other transactions.

“In one instance, Rs 50 million cash owed to Taprobane Securities (as a seller of stock) was delayed by Sampath probably hoping to recover the Rs 390 million through such an exercise,” one source said. Sampath Bank is yet to receive the Rs 390 million from the NSB.

An advertisement by the NSB on Thursday that ran on all newspapers explaining the role of the bank in the transaction raised more questions than clearing the air over the deal. The same statement was uploaded on NSB’s intranet for all staff to access. Bank branches have been fielding many questions on credibility issues by depositors and the security of their deposits.

The statement said: “The bank received an invitation from a stock broker to purchase voting shares in March 2012. Since the bank had already carried out a detailed analysis in January 2011, the Board Sub-committee on Corporate Lending and Equity Investment decided to re-look at the investment from a strategic initiative point of view with further analysis. Having done a further analysis a favourable consideration was given to purchase voting shares of TFC amounting to 10%-15%.

However, since the Board was of the view that benefits of this investment is not as strong enough to proceed with, a decision was taken not to make the payment, due on this transaction.”

Traders asked why the committee or the board didn’t make this assessment before deciding to go ahead with the transaction and then suspending payment. “This creates serious problem in the market because anyone can take a decision to buy and just before payment is due, say they are not interested.

 The other question is why Sampath Bank settled the sellers without waiting for the custodian bank to settle,” one trader asked.

source -

No comments: